L’utilité de la philosophie
Une perspective pragmatiste sur son incidence sociale
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.29105/aitias6.6-138Mots-clés :
philosophie publique, pragmatisme, incidence sociale, démocratie, science et valeursRésumé
Ces dernières années, la philosophie a été confrontée à des interrogations récurrentes concernant son utilité sociale et son isolement académique supposé. Face aux diagnostics qui la décrivent comme une discipline de plus en plus autoréférentielle et détachée des problèmes publics, cet article propose de repenser l’incidence sociale de la philosophie à partir d’une perspective pragmatiste élargie. En s’appuyant sur une analyse critique des débats contemporains autour de la philosophie publique et de la philosophie appliquée, il soutient que l’utilité de la philosophie ne peut être évaluée à l’aide d’un critère unique. L’article développe un modèle tripartite de l’incidence sociale — individuelle et communautaire, institutionnelle et épistémique, ainsi que culturelle et mythologique — inspiré des travaux de John Dewey, Philip Kitcher et Mary Midgley. Cette approche permet de reconnaître différentes formes légitimes de contribution philosophique à la vie démocratique, à la gouvernance du savoir et à la clarification morale.
Téléchargements
Références
Burroughs, Michael D. “How to Survive a Crisis: Reclaiming Philosophy as a Public Practice.” Palgrave Communications 4, no. 106 (2018): 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0163-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0163-z
Conix, Stijin, Oliver Lemeire, y Pei-Shan Chi. “The Public Relevance of Philosophy.” Synthese 200 (2022): 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03546-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03546-9
Daly, Siobhan. “Public and Private in an Era of Entrepreneurial Philanthropy: Exploring John Dewey’s The Public and Its Problems (1927/2016) to (Re)conceptualize Philanthropy as a Public.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 53, no. 5 (2024): 1282-1305. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640231214740 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640231214740
De Cruz, Helen, Johan De Smedt. “Melioristic Genealogies and Indigenous Philosophies.” The Philosophical Forum 53, no. 4 (2022): 209-226. https://doi.org/10.1111/phil.12327 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/phil.12327
Dennett, Daniel. “Higher-Order Truths about Chmess.” Topoi 25 (2006): 39-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-006-0005-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-006-0005-2
Dewey, John. The Public and Its Problems. Henry Holt and Company, 1927.
Dewey, John. Philosophy and Civilization. Minton, Balch & Company, 1931.
Dewey, John. Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. The Macmillan Company, 1916.
Faerna, Ángel M. “El concepto de “asertabilidad garantizada” en la lógica naturalista de Dewey: tres malentendidos.” Teorema 43, no. 1 (2024): 29-45. https://doi.org/10.30827/teorema
Fricker, Miranda. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford University Press, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001
Garrison, Jim, Stefan Neubert, y Kersten Reich. John Dewey’s Philosophy of Education: An Introduction and Recontextualization for Our Times. Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137026187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137026187
Kago, Kevin, y Prabhu Venkataraman. “In Defense of Kitcher’s Pragmatic Naturalism.” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 17, no. 2 (2025): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.4000/15d8s DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/15d8s
Keller, Evelyn F., y Philip Kitcher. The Seasons Alter: How to Save Our Planet in Six Acts. W. W. Norton & Company, 2017.
Kitcher, Philip. What’s the Use of Philosophy? Oxford University Press, 2023.
Kitcher, Philip. “Social Progress.” Social Philosophy and Policy 34, no. 2 (2017): 46-65. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052517000206. v DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052517000206
Kitcher, Philip. “Some Answers, Admissions, and Explanations.” En Philip Kitcher: Pragmatic Naturalism, editado por Marie I. Kaiser y Ansgar Seide, 175-205. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110324884.175
Kitcher, Philip. The Ethical Project. Harvard University Press, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674063075
Kitcher, Philip. “Philosophy Inside Out.” Metaphilosophy 42, no. 3 (2011): 248-260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01684.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01684.x
Kitcher, Philip. Science, Truth, and Democracy. Oxford University Press, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0195145836.001.0001
Kitcher, Philip. The Lives to Come: The Genetic Revolution and Human Possibilities. Simon & Schuster, 1996.
Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper, Kimberley Brownlee, y David Coady, eds. A Companion to Applied Philosophy. Blackwell, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118869109
Lipscomb, Benjamin J. B. The Women are Up to Something: How Elizabeth Anscombe, Philippa Foot, Mary Midgley, and Iris Murdoch Revolutionized Ethics. Oxford University Press, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197541074.001.0001
Mac Cumhaill, Clare y Rachael Wiseman. Metaphysical Animals: How Four Women Brought Philosophy Back to Life. Anchor, 2022.
McIntyre, Lee, Nancy McHugh, y Ian Olasov, eds. A Companion to Public Philosophy. Blackwell, 2025.
McIntyre, Lee. On Disinformation: How to Fight for Truth and Protect Democracy. The MIT Press, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/14889.001.0001
Midgley, Mary. What Is Philosophy For? Bloomsbury Academic, 2018.
Midgley, Mary. The Owl of Minerva: A Memoir. Routledge, 2005.
Midgley, Mary. The Myths We Live By. Routledge, 2003.
Midgley, Mary. Science as Salvation: A Modern Myth and Its Meaning. Routledge, 1992.
Midgley, Mary. “Philosophical Plumbing.” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements 33 (1992): 139-151. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246100002319 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246100002319
Midgley, Mary. Evolution as a Religion: Strange Hopes and Stranger Fears. Methuen, 1985.
Midgley, Mary. Beast and Man: The Roots of Human Nature. Harvester Press, 1978.
Pavlis, Dimitris, & John Gkiosos. “John Dewey, From Philosophy of Pragmatism to Progressive Education.” Journal of Arts & Humanities 6, no. 9 (2017): 23-30. https://doi.org/10.18533/journal.v6i9.1257 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18533/journal.v6i9.1257
Philippi, Cristian Larroulet. “Well-Ordered Science’s Basic Problem.” Philosophy of Science 87, no. 2 (2020): 365-375. https://doi.org/10.1086/707539 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/707539
Pereda, Carlos. “Latin American Philosophy: Some Vices.” The Journal of Speculative Philosophy 20, no. 3 (2006): 192-203. https://doi.org/10.2307/25670617 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/25670617
Platts, Mark de B. Moral Realities: An Essay in Philosophical Psychology. Routledge, 1991.
Velleman, J. David. Foundations for Moral Relativism. Open Book Publishers, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0029.04
Ye, Yan-Hong, & Yi-Huang Shih. “Development of John Dewey’s Educational Philosophy and its Implications for Children’s Education.” Policy Futures in Education 19, no. 8 (2021): 877-890. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210320987678 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210320987678
Téléchargements
Publiée
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Catégories
Licence
© Mario Gensollen Mendoza 2026
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale 4.0 International.
Los autores/as que publiquen en esta revista aceptan las siguientes condiciones:
1. Los autores/as conservan los derechos de autor y ceden a la revista AITÍAS el derecho de la primera publicación, con el trabajo registrado con la licencia de atribución de Creative Commons CC-BY, que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que mencionen la autoría del trabajo y a la primera publicación en esta revista.
2. Los autores/as pueden realizar otros acuerdos contractuales independientes y adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en esta revista (p. ej., incluirlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro) siempre que indiquen claramente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en AITÍAS, Revista de Estudios Filosóficos del Centro de Estudios Humanísticos de la UANL.
