Superveniencia, Implicación y Objetos Vagos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29105/aitas2.3-27Keywords:
supervenience, object description, entailment, intensional semanticsAbstract
Not long ago came into common use, the relation of supervenience is rapidly gaining in popularity. At the same time, its logical nature, in particular its possible correlations with such fundamental logical relation as entailment, remains unresolved and needs clarification. In this paper, I compare these two relations and outline a new approach to formal explication of supervenience. In so doing, I employ as main sources two conceptions: of intensional semantics, and impossible object descriptions as its core part, introduced in section 3, and of relevant consequence relation, briefly described in section 4, where I also delineate a new entailment interpretation of supevenience. Thus, quite naturally we arrive at contradictory and incomplete descriptions of objects, and that way, uncertainty comes into play. Equally, it allows to propose a tentative definition of supervenience without referring to the terminology of the possible worlds semantics.
Downloads
References
Asmus, Conrad, and Greg Restall. "A history of the consequence relations." Handbook of the history of logic. Vol. 11, 11-61. North-Holland, 2012, p. 22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-52937-4.50001-0
Belnap, Nuel D. "A useful four-valued logic." In Modern uses of multiple-valued logic, 5-37. Springer, Dordrecht, 1977. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1161-7_2
Dunn, J. Michael. "An intuitive semantics for first degree relevant implications." Journal of Symbolic Logic 36, no. 2 (1971): 362-363.
Dunn, J. Michael. "Intuitive semantics for first-degree entailment and ‘coupled trees’." Philosophical Studies 29 (1976): 149-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00373152
Dunn, J. Michael, and Greg Restall. "Relevance logic." Handbook of philosophical logic, 1-128. Springer, Dordrecht, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0460-1_1
French, Steven, and Decio Krause, "Quantum objects are vague objects." Sorites 6 (1996): 21-33.
Glashoff, Klaus. "An intensional Leibniz semantics for Aristotelian logic." The Review of Symbolic Logic 3, no. 2 (2010): 262-272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755020309990396
Kim, Jaegwon. "Psychophysical supervenience." Philosophical studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 41, no.1 (1982): 51-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00353523
Kim, Jaegwon. Supervenience and mind: Selected philosophical essays. Cambridge University Press, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625220
Konkova, Antonina, and Maria Legeydo, “Intensional Semantics for Syllogistics: what Leibniz and Vasiliev Have in Common” Logic and Logical Philosophy (2022) To appear DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/LLP.2022.006
Lewis, David K., On the plurality of worlds. Vol. 322. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986.
Markin, Vladimir, Syllogistic Theories in Modern Logic. Moscow: MSU, 1991. (in Russian)
Markin, Vladimir, "What trends in non-classical logic were anticipated by Nikolai Vasiliev?." Logical Investigations 19 (2013): 122-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21146/2074-1472-2013-19-0-122-135
McLaughlin, Brian, and Karen Bennett, "Supervenience", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/supervenience/>.
McLaughlin, Brian P., "Supervenience, vagueness, and determination." Philosophical perspectives 11 (1997): 209-230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0029-4624.31.s11.10
Menzel, Christopher, "Possible Worlds", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/possible-worlds/>.
Ryabkov, Maxim, "Paradox of the duplication of physical information." Humanities & Social Sciences Communications 8, no.1 (2021): 1-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00803-z
Van Rooij, Robert. "Leibnizian intensional semantics for syllogistic reasoning." In Recent Trends in Philosophical Logic, 179-194. Springer, Cham, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06080-4_13
Voishvillo, E. K. "Semantics of Generalized State Descriptions." In Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, 104 (315-323). Elsevier, 1982. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0049-237X(09)70202-2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Dmitry Zatzev
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Los autores/as que publiquen en esta revista aceptan las siguientes condiciones:
1. Los autores/as conservan los derechos de autor y ceden a la revista AITÍAS el derecho de la primera publicación, con el trabajo registrado con la licencia de atribución de Creative Commons CC-BY, que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que mencionen la autoría del trabajo y a la primera publicación en esta revista.
2. Los autores/as pueden realizar otros acuerdos contractuales independientes y adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en esta revista (p. ej., incluirlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro) siempre que indiquen claramente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en AITÍAS, Revista de Estudios Filosóficos del Centro de Estudios Humanísticos de la UANL.
